ECEC@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoLiquid Treeslemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up1558arrow-down1196
arrow-up1362arrow-down1external-linkLiquid Treeslemmy.worldECEC@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square144fedilink
minus-squarezeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down6·edit-214 hours agotrees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.
minus-squareKokesh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 hours agoPeople ruin nature’s infrastructure
minus-squaretoastmeister@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·12 hours agoBe sure to not reproduce.
minus-squarePsychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·14 hours ago trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure I think you mean all, as this reads more like “nuh uh, trees don’t ruin anything” But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist. And those are not the norm, so for places that don’t plan to just destroy what’s already there and start anew, this is an option
trees dont ruin ANY human infrastructure. But the usual urban infrastructure isnt well thought out enough to exist around trees. But smarter urbanism is possible and in fact does exist.
People ruin nature’s infrastructure
Be sure to not reproduce.
I think you mean all, as this reads more like “nuh uh, trees don’t ruin anything”
And those are not the norm, so for places that don’t plan to just destroy what’s already there and start anew, this is an option