I tried testing a movie from my home server in plex through firefox and repeatedly got this message, even after reloading.

I knew that they had paywalled the apps on mobile and streaming from outside the network but now they have also blocked watching your own movies through your own hardware.

I do get the point that making software should be able to sustain people but I dont see the move of plex as a fair thing to do. Yes, they have made great software but taking your home server hostage feels like the wrong move.

Even a pop up that says “we need you to donate please” would have been fine. make it pop up before every movie, play donation ads before any movie but straight up disabling the app is kinda cruel.

Anyway, i have switched to jellyfin and it is insanely good. please give it a try. you can run it alongside plex with not issues (at least i had none) and compare the two.

In any case, good luck. Let me know if you need help.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Jellyfin is great, but in defense of Plex, they announced that remote streaming would require one of the two parties to have a Plex pass was coming back in March so I don’t know if it’s fair to say they are holding anything hostage.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I started down the Jellyfin path after they made that announcement. It’s super easy to install, and in many ways the UI is nicer than Plex. But I ran into challenges getting my server safely accessible for users outside my LAN. And I haven’t had the time to look into that further.

      Would be great if there was a clean, easy way to set up the webserver portion so it’s as easy to share content entirely as Plex. But I get they are a volunteer project with a lot on their plate.

          • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s kinda the same as it was before, as far as I can see, for the personal plan. Looks like they’ve just added more the ability to add more than 3 users for a fee.

          • Bubs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Took a quick look at the free tier,

            • 3 users
            • 100 devices
            • Basically all tailscale features

            That seems pretty reasonable to me. Main account and two accounts to share. With just friends and family, I doubt most people will reach the 100 device limit.

            • morriscox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Creating a tailnet using a custom domain is considered for business use.

              Well, that sucks for me. I was planning on using my domain name.

              • death916@lemmy.death916.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                The tailnet domain doesn’t really matter that much if you have your own. I just use tailscale IP for everything that’s not in adgaurs with a host name already

          • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I’m willing to recommend Tailscale because I run headscale and it does basically everything a selfhoster needs. When the free version is passable, it’s harder to enshitify the commercial version.

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s great until you try and get it working on your <insert person here that doesn’t live with you>’s TV via their streaming device.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        But I ran into challenges getting my server safely accessible for users outside my LAN

        FWIW:

        1. vps + domain (optional?)
        2. connect vps to home server with wireguard (eg Tailscale)
        3. reverse proxy on the VPS forwarding to jellyfin (eg Caddy)

        Obviously not as trivial or seamless as Plex. Also I wouldn’t try to complicate this setup by using docker for everything. But once its up you can basically host whatever you want on the WAN from your LAN.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        The safe usage outside of my network has always been a sticking point as well. I run it locally but my Plex server is in used by several of my family and friends, as well as my wife who is not as tech savvy, so having her run jellyfin on everything is really not fair. Especially when we have young children. She doesn’t really have time to troubleshoot, she needs things to kind of work on command.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If they’re calling it remote streaming when you’re on the same (local) network, that’s not exactly intuitive. I’d say OP’s phrasing was fair.

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Just because the destination IP address is not a LAN address? That’s not misconfiguration, that’s a legitimate use of NAT reflection/loopback. If that’s how it determines who is streaming remotely then just run it behind nginx that forgets to set the correct headers.

          Edit: Apparently Plex centrally relays all the traffic? Self-hosted my 🍑, it’s not self-hosted if you need to rely on their server.

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It doesn’t relay all traffic, that’s a fallback if a connection can’t be established.

              • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                12 hours ago

                OP is also in the allegedly ultra rare camp of “successfully configured Jellyfin and lived to tell the tale.” Not what I’d expect of someone unable to configure Plex correctly. I’ve not set up a Plex server myself but my guess is it wasn’t clear that it was misconfigured - it did work previously, after all.

                • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I can’t speak for OP, but I self host lots of stuff, have literally dozens of services running, have an Ansible repo to manage it all and routi some stuff through a VPS, not to mention my day job has included managing services in one way or another for a long while. This is to say, I know what I’m doing. I couldn’t setup Plex to work the way I wanted to, they expect it to run in a docker with network set to host mode, I couldn’t find any way to tell Plex that my living room TV was in the same network, it just wouldn’t accept any connections as local. I know I shot myself in the foot here by not letting it run with network on host mode, but I shouldn’t have to, the port was exposed, I could reach it through the local network IP, but I wasn’t able to stream any content locally.

                • gdog05@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Well, with Plex constantly changing allowed abilities and such, it seems to me that this is the expected outcome.

                  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    This is one change (which isn’t the cause of OP’s problem) that they announced months ago. I’ve been using it for well over a decade and while I have had major issues with it in the past going so far as to setup Emby and buying a lifetime license for that, I would hardly say that they’re “constantly changing allowed abilities.”

                    Most people’s issue with them is that they focus too much on adding new stuff that nobody asked for while ignoring longtime bugs. I can’t recall a time they’ve ever locked anything behind a paywall that wasn’t a brand new feature prior to this.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, there is no defence on enshittification, sorry. I have jellyfin now. Its also not remote which makes this a huge dick move too.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I have it set up in a way. That does not make it wrong. This is an option that plex gives you without warning so its their problem in the first place. They also just paywalled that feature that worked for years and they’re not considering the consequences or they dont care. The least they could have done is put a link “if youre seeing this on your home network, you need to do THIS.”

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You set it up in the wrong way if you want to stream locally on your network.

              It’s ok to admit that you made a mistake and it’s not plex’s fault. Just take some responsibility for your actions.