made you look
Git itself (Or any other VCS for that matter) really should treat symlinks as special, similar as to how btrfs stores everything as “reflinks” internally. They be stored as special references to other tracked objects (so it’d be impossible to commit a symlink that pointed at anything other than a checked-in file, and ensure they always match), and git can materialise them as needed.
The headline makes this sound a lot worse than the article does.
From the article there’s basically a list of exemptions in the law that describes who doesn’t need to follow it (e.g. an online booking site for doctors visits), everybody else needs to check the rules to see if they do. And if they do, they then need to follow extra child safety rules (e.g. Roblox is opting out under-16s from open DMs by default)
GitHub can quite rightly say they don’t fall under the restrictions of the law, and that could be the end of it. The simple fact that it doesn’t have any form of private messaging feature is probably enough.
they’re just a radical left communist
God I wish that was remotely true
I’ve never used 6rd, but I did use 6to4 for a while (A long time ago) and I got a GUA from that. 6rd is closely related to 6to4 so I naïvely expect them to work similarly?
Now I did it all with OpenWRT, but the gist was you set the tunnel information on the WAN side in the webui, and it produced the configuration for the LAN side. Since it’s a tunnel you never actually set any of the v6 details on the actual WAN adapter, outside of routing (i.e. what v4 endpoint do you send stuff to).